Category: Spiritual Writings

“In 1944, Max Planck, the man many consider to be the father of quantum theory, shocked the world by saying that there is a ‘matrix’ of energy that provides the blueprint for our physical world.  In this place of pure energy, everything begins, from the birth of stars and DNA to our deepest relationships, peace between nations, and personal healing.  The willingness to embrace the matrix’s existence in mainstream science is still so new that scientists have yet to agree upon a single name for it.

Some simply call it the ‘field.’  Others have referred to it with terms that range from the technical-sounding ‘quantum hologram’ to almost spiritual-seeming names, such as the ‘mind of God’ and ‘nature’s mind.’  In my 2007 book describing the history and proof of the field, I echoed the bridging effect that it has had between science and spirituality, referring to it as the Divine Matrix.  The experimental proof that Planck’s matrix is real now provides the missing link that bridges our spiritual experiences of belief, imagination, and prayer with the miracles that we see in the world around us.

The reason why Planck’s words are so powerful is because they forever changed the way we think of our bodies, our world, and our role in the universe.  They imply that we’re much more than simply the ‘observers’ that scientists have described, passing through a brief moment of time in a creation that already exists.  Through the connection that joins all things, the experiments have now shown that we directly affect the waves and particles of the universe.

In short, the universe responds to our beliefs.  It is this difference — thinking of us as powerful creators rather than passive observers — that has become the crux of some of the greatest controversy among some of the greatest minds in recent history.  The implications are absolutely staggering.”

The Spontaneous Healing Of Belief – Shattering The Paradigm Of False Limits, Gregg Braden, pgs. 12 – 13.

“If there were no intelligent observers in the physical universe, the physical universe would cease to exist. 

Almost all of us have no conscious awareness of our ability to make the cosmic movie play in 3-dimensions, or to shape our bodies in accordance with our deeply held thoughts.

A rare few, however, are consciously aware of these abilities and have learned how to use them deliberately.  The rare few are the saints and sages, and they assure us that we, too, can do the same.

Our physical bodies, like the costumes of actors on a stage, are part of the cosmic movie.  But just as costumed actors are not their costumes, we are not our bodies.  Our bodies are 3-dimensional costumes we need to wear to play our parts on this 3-dimensional stage.  And, as actors, the parts we play are only a small part of who and what we are.  We simultaneously exist with and beyond this physical world.  Our consciousness is nonlocal, essentially infinite, and like the high-frequency energies of our energy body; it exists beyond, yet interpenetrates, our physical bodies.

We are godlike.  (Jesus answered them, ‘Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods?’)  The experimentally confirmed and confounding need for the presence of an intelligent observer in order for the matter-wave to behave like matter is a profound hint, provided by science, that we are far more than physical bodies, far more than biological machines, far more, even, than holographic projections of our energy bodies.

We are one with the infinite intelligent consciousness that creates Reality.  The cosmic movie was made for us.  Without us, without our attention, the cosmic movie will not play.

‘The universe and the observer exist as a pair.’ –  Andrei Linde, Stanford University physicist.

‘There is no object in space-time without a conscious subject looking at it.’ – Amit Goswami, quantum physicist. 

‘With our thoughts, we make the world.’ – Buddha.”

The Physics Of God, How The Deepest Theories Of Science Explain Religion And How The Deepest Truths Of Religion Explain Science, Joseph Selbie, pgs. 138, 142.